We’re going to have to wait until January or February 2018 to see what the government is going to do.įollow on Twitter for the latest computer security news.Coca Cola and Geek Squad present quite an interesting comparison within the business marketing world because they are entirely different products and services that bond over one principal concept and that concept is adapting to environmental changes of multiple generations. Riddet said his client would be contesting the legality of the search, but that it’s now up to prosecutors to decide whether the case will proceed. The doctor also verbally consented to an engineer checking his hard drive, The Register reports. Judge Carney ruled that the Geek Squad search was legitimate since the defendant had signed a contract that contains a warning that illegal material will be reported. The bureau has also been guiding Geek Squad technicians as they develop a program to find abusive content.Īlthough Judge Carney’s ruling that evidence was inadmissible was a win for Rettenmaier’s defense lawyer, the judge didn’t go along with Riddet’s contention that his client had a legal expectation of privacy from Geek Squad employees searching his computer. Mark Rettenmaier, the FBI has been paying Best Buy supervisors for the work, and management has been fully aware of it. Otherwise, Fourth Amendment issues around search and seizure come into play, as does the question of privacy violation, potentially turning Geek Squad technicians’ scouring of computers into warrantless searches by law enforcement.Īccording to the court documents in USA v. That’s because government agents need to first get a warrant, based on probable cause, to search a computer. In addition, whether or not Geek Squad City technicians acted as government agents by accepting FBI payments, regularly speaking with FBI agents (on a first-name basis) and referring cases to them, and working with them to create a program to search for abuse images, has been core to determining whether their searches are permissible as evidence. Those images can be discovered only with special software, the expert said in a hearing with Judge Carney, according to OC Weekly. In fact, it came from unallocated space: a problem for the prosecutors in their case against Rettenmaier.Īs it is, a few weeks before Rettenmaier was arrested, federal judges had ruled in a separate case that child abuse images found in unallocated space couldn’t be used to win a possession conviction, since there’s almost no way to figure out who put them there, who viewed them, or when/why they were deleted.Įven a technical expert for the prosecutors conceded in court that dozens, if not hundreds or thousands, of sex images can be uploaded without the knowledge of those surfing the internet. Judge Carney last week called agents “dishonest” because when they were applying for a search warrant, they neglected to mention just where, exactly, on the PC that the image in question came from. Those searches have been extensive: Geek Squad employees have gone so far as to search unallocated space on hard drives – ie, the place where forensics analysts use specialized software to find and retrieve deleted files. In fact, unbeknownst to customers such as Rettenmaier, for years, the FBI has trained and paid Geek Squad employees to search for child abuse imagery on computer equipment. As the case has dragged on and documents have come to light, it turns out that the FBI has been in a relationship with Geek Squad workers that defense attorney James D Riddet has called “cozy” and “so extensive that it turns searches by Best Buy into government searches”. When Geek Squad techs ran a search, they retrieved the deleted image of a young girl.Īt issue is how the Geek Squad employees found that image. It all began in 2011, when Rettenmaier took his HP Pavilion computer to Best Buy for repair because it wouldn’t boot. FBI agents were disingenuous when they applied for a search warrant, leaving out a crucial detail of where Geek Squad employees had found the image that triggered the investigation.Īccording to OC Weekly, District Court Judge Cormac J Carney announced on May 15 that the FBI’s tainted search warrant required him to suppress alleged evidence collected during a raid on Rettenmaier’s house in 2012.Even though the still was taken from a well-known child abuse video, it doesn’t meet the legal definition of child porn, the judge said. The image launched the case, a raid on his house in 2012, and the arrest of California gynecologist Mark Rettenmaier. An image found on his PC when it was in for repairs with Best Buy’s Geek Squad didn’t show a prepubescent girl’s genitals or that she was having sex.The government’s case against an alleged trafficker in child abuse images is on shaky ground after a California judge last week said that:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |